Critical approaches for your essays, and their associated questions

I. Formalist-thematic questions (repetition-amidst-variation, moral of the story)

1. What is the meaning?

2. How do the details (especially repeated motifs) reinforce the meaning?

3. How does irony work?

4. What is the engine for the plot, the trigger that gets everything going?

5. How do characters change in the course of the work?

6. Is there any character doubling? Are there characters who seem quite different who are put by the author into the same situations, the same predicaments? Are there any characters that might embody just one component of an identity rather than a whole? Is the complementary component then filled in by a different character?

II. Sociocultural questions, emphasizing identity politics and aggressive readings

Questions of this kind might be decided on before you even open the text, but in order to sustain a good essay, eventually you must ground your answers to these questions in the text. Mostly, this line of questioning asks you to say what norms the work sponsors, particularly if it were read as the document that characterizes a culture. Generalizing from particulars, thus, is permissible from this viewpoint. Readings that are not invited by the texts are especially good, since they will not overlap with the thematic reading (above).

1. In what ways are common stereotypes (choose a group) reinforced? In what ways are they challenged?

2. How are women treated by men? How are men treated by women? (These are not symmetrical questions.)

3. How are blacks treated by whites? How are whites treated by blacks? (These are not symmetrical questions.)

4. How does the work treat questions of class?

5. Other group sensibilities?

6. What is the place of ritual in the work? –religion? –technology?

7. What cultural values does the work ascribe to, perhaps unwittingly?

III. Linguistic and self-referential questions (deconstructive readings)

1. What is the author’s attitude toward his or her own art?

2. How might this artwork be said to attempt to describe the conditions of its own production? How does it fail? (It always must fail.)

3. Is there any hint of the idea that life (as rendered by art, of course) imitates art?

4. Are there indications that words and language are failing in their capacity as references to a stable meaning?

5. Is there any indication that a search for origins would be futile?

6. In what way does framing an event alter the content of what is inside the frame?

 

If you are moved to ask all of these questions (or all from a particular subheading) when reading, you will arrive at many interesting insights, but you will probably have too much for an essay. Just choose a few. Strive for a focused essay.

 

See also: Worksheet for a Literary Essay Fiction worksheet, especially for final assignment

and (especially for Sociocultural Readings, above): Reading Against the Grain of the Text link not yet enabled